Dostoevsky’s devilish insight

I am impressed that Dostoevsky saw clearly the insanity that follows when people try to live without moral imperatives. We need grounding in something greater than ourselves—actually in the infinite. Even the combined wisdom of all mankind (supposing such a thing could be distilled) would not be a sufficient base for action. Some of Dostoevsky’s nihilists (in his novel The Possessed aka The Devils) saw the need to invoke Christ. However, because they were at heart unbelievers, the invocation of Christ was merely a tool in their schemes, and consequently exerted no moral power.

Dostoevsky’s insight exposes Satan’s tactics. Antichrist will, I think, ride in on a wave of pretended restoration of moral values and verities, and thus be welcomed by Christians and conservatives. Let us hope they will quickly wake up to his true nature.


Should you be vaxxed for the current virus?

First let it be said no one should be forced to take an experimental drug. Indeed, under the Nuremburg Code the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. See or etc.

See also Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Americans in a clinical study must give their written consent to any medical treatment such as vaccination. Informed consent requires candidates for vaccination to be given the right to refuse vaccination; have the right to confidentiality (privacy) that their vaccination data will not be shared with other parties without their consent; and have the right to know if there are any alternatives to vaccination.

To give voluntary consent, you need information. But how can you make an informed decision when many powerful news outlets, governmental agencies, and social platforms have combined to suppress questions about the efficacy and safety of the supposed remedy? Since plenty of sources, official and unofficial, are urging you to get the shot, here are a few sources with good credentials warning otherwise.


Dr. Peter MacCullough

Dr. Mike Yeadon Was vice-president of Pfizer research. He uses the words “criminal” and “evil” in describing what is being done with the vaccines.

Charles Hoffe.

Dr. Bossche, a world-renowned vaccinologist.

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi An American-trained microbiologist, Bhakdi says the mRNA vaccines are, not only loaded with poisons, they alter the natural immune system in such a way that it will greatly overreact when the victim is exposed later to almost any pathogen including the common flu. also at

Dr. Karladine Graves has a knack for explaining in everyday terms why the vax is dangerous.

ARTICLES European Medicines Agency Official: “Clear Link” Between AstraZeneca Vaccine and Blood Clots in the Brain

Dr. Steven Hotze M.D. “Moderna has never successfully developed a product for treatment of any disease prior to this,” he states. “An experimental gene therapy using synthetic mRNA to treat an infectious disease has never been attempted in humans, because of its failure in previous animal studies.”

Here are forms that might cause your employer or school to think twice before forcing you to take the shot:

Insights from Dreher

Recently I read Thinkr’s condensation of Rod Dreher’s Live Not by Lies: A Manual for Christian Dissidents. One key insight: “Fragmentation and isolation are close friends that cultivate the ideal breeding ground for an oppressive ideology to flourish.” He recommends we engage with small groups who practice truth apart from oppressive technology, because the most powerful means of resistance is faith. Begin today to cultivate belief within the context of a small group if you have not already done so. And (to draw another idea from Dreher) protect your privacy as much as possible.

Cancel Culture

Revelation 13:15-18 depicts cancel culture in its ultimate expression and 2 Thessalonians 2:11 warns us that the Man of Lawlessness (= the antichrist and the beast) will appear in a world beset by corruption and strong delusions. The socio-economic conditions predicted in Scripture for the end times are congealing around us. Two indicators evolving in front of our eyes are (1) the globalists’ growing ability to cancel Christians, Jews, and conservatives and (2) their ability to create false narratives that sway masses across continents. Trump pushed back on both fronts and that partly explains why he was so vilified. Fortunately the media’s ability to deceive is not yet total. But the day will come when, as Christ warned, the deception will be so slick and accompanied by so many seeming miracles, that even the very elect would be deceived if that were possible (Matthew 24:24).

A Chilling Comment

Finished reading Michael Rectenwald’s Google Archipelago a couple days ago. He lays out the leftist totalitarian tendencies of big tech. One of his most chilling observations (page 128 of the Kindle version) is “‘Russiagate’ must be understood as probably the first major combined effort by the political establishment, the mass media, and Big Digital to produce and promote a fictional narrative, a simulated reality, and to deem anyone who refused, denied, or countered said narrative a Russian bot, or worse.”

When the Bible’s Man of Lawlessness (aka the beast, the antichrist) comes, his age will be marked by strong delusions (2 Thess 2:8–10). Seems we are fast headed that way.

Indicators from Bible Prophecies Are Unfolding Before Our Eyes

We seem to be rapidly drawing closer to the era of geological prophecies discussed in my book The Earth Will Reel. In it I argue that the geological events dovetail with specific socio-economic conditions predicted in Scripture. Two indicators that are evolving in front of our eyes are (1) the globalists’ growing ability to integrate cancellation of Christians, Jews, and conservatives and (2) the ability to create false narratives that sway vast masses.

By suppressing news and pushing untrue or half-true narratives, governments, working in tandem with the media, created false narratives about the Chinese virus pandemic and about the 2020 US election. Revelation 13:15-18 depicts cancel culture in its ultimate expression and 2 Thessalonians 2:11 warns us that the Man of Lawlessness (called elsewhere the antichrist and the beast) will appear in a world beset by strong delusions.

Fortunately the ability to deceive is not yet total. But the day will come, Christ warned, when the deception will be so slick and accompanied by so many seeming miracles, that even the very elect will be deceived if that were possible (Matthew 24:24).

Violence begets violence

We are seeing a lot of violence in our streets these days. More is being largely ignored in our big cities where murder rates are awful. A repeated lament of Old Testament prophets such as Hosea, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel was that violence was being done in Israel and Judah. For example, God, through Ezekiel said, “Have you seen this, O son of man? Is it a trivial thing to the house of Judah to commit the abominations which they commit here? For they have filled the land with violence; then they have returned to provoke Me to anger. . . . Therefore I also will act in fury. My eye will not spare nor will I have pity; and though they cry in My ears with a loud voice, I will not hear them.” (Ezekiel 8:17-18)

The New Testament also rebukes violence.

No one reason explains the violence. However a contributing factor may be news and entertainment. Not just doing violence but being entertained by it is dangerous. The Universities of Michigan and Iowa State undertook studies which showed that violent media numbs viewers to the suffering of others.

Separate studies were conducted by Brad Bushman and Craig Anderson. These demonstrated that exposure to violence in media and in video games makes people slower to respond when others are being attacked, and causes them to downplay the seriousness of violent actions such as fights.

These findings validate the wisdom of David, another Bible writer, who, in psalm 101, vowed to put no evil thing before his eyes.

The spiritual trumps the physical

Things that cannot be seen are as often as not more real than those that can be touched and handled. This fact has profound implications.

First let me give a sense of what I mean. Imaginary numbers are a relatively late mathematical development. They do not represent physical items such as stones or loaves of bread that we can actually pick up and handle, add to or take away from. Nonetheless, these “imaginary” entities are absolutely crucial to representing the full range of physical reality.

If you have seen the movie The Final Season, you know that it is based on the true story of the Norway, Iowa, baseball team. Norway, with a population of just five hundred, consistently produced state champions who defeated teams of larger, better funded, and seemingly more-talented schools. Realities that could not be seen or measured proved more important to victory than size or numbers.

Love, faith, determination, and bravery are invisible. Yet they have made an impact as great as armies. Jesus possessed of none of the visible trappings which are generally considered requisites for success: money, position, armies, lands. Yet on the strength of intangible characteristics, he created an impact that has steadily widened over two thousand years.

History is replete with examples of underdogs whose invisible, immeasurable attributes beat odds to triumph over superior foes. Joan of Arc comes to mind.

The Bible has something to say about this. Paul refers to the astonishing vitality of seeming nonexistent things in 1 Corinthians 1:29,29: “God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God,” and again in 2 Corinthians 4:18 he says, “we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.” In other words, the spiritual trumps the physical; the unseen trumps the seen.

Now I take such instances as a line of evidence to support the Bible’s contention that “what is seen was not made out of what was visible” (Hebrews 11:3). Science itself now asserts that the universe was created out of nothing visible. Not surprisingly, then, a master/servant relationship exists between the spiritual and physical. Because it is more ultimate, the spiritual can trump the physical.

Churches in Lockdown: A Personal Response

Early in the Wuhan virus[1] lockdown, I emailed my pastor: “May I come to church?” Fewer than 10 people would be present. I planned to wear a mask and distance myself. 

Michigan’s governor had declared church gatherings nonessential and our church had substituted online services. I had not been able to access the live stream (never could). 

A couple days later I got my answer: No.

Church gatherings, he explained, were against our governor’s order and the church council did not want to risk liability. 

My church’s response was not unique. Some churches did not wait for stay-at-home orders. One pastor emailed me: “Our diocese—all the Episcopal churches in the region—was already in the middle of suspending worship voluntarily when the Kentucky governor asked churches to close.” 

She reminded me that 45 members of a Washington choir had contracted Wuhan virus during a rehearsal and at least two died. 

All the same, I had a gut sense we were cheating ourselves. I write about heroes from church history. I found myself wondering, “What would Cyprian counsel? How would Sebastian Castellio respond? What would Ashbel Green Simonton do?” 

Cyprian urged third-century Christians to nurse their persecutors during a plague. Castellio risked his life visiting contagious parishioners when other clergy in sixteenth-century Geneva would not. Against the pleas of friends and family, Simonton settled in a pestilence-ridden Brazilian city to share the gospel—and died of fever in 1867. 

I wondered if churches that allowed themselves to be defined as nonessential were not tacitly admitting a truth. Shutting down without pushback at Easter on the orders of secular governors seemed more than a little shocking, not only because of the aura of fear it exuded but also because of the unconstitutional precedents it established (not just the right of religious practice, but of assembly, of free speech, and of exercise of property rights—the use of church property).[2]

Easter services were an obvious casualty of church shutdowns, but other deprivations continued. During the pandemic, Christians needed one another more than ever. 

Many were scared. Some had lost their livelihoods and yearned for encouragement. Brethren in poorer countries faced starvation and needed our intercession. In the West we risked real loss of liberties and should have been pushing back. Suicide, alcoholism, and domestic abuse were on the rise, but Christians could not look into the hopeless person’s eyes, smell the drinker’s breath, or see the victim’s bruises because observers and victims were sheltering in place. 

International events demanded that church leaders convene to strategize. Unless the world experiences a strong economic rebound, wars are probable as nations scramble for resources or levy blame in a contracted global economy.

When I mentioned my concern to one of my friends, whom I’ll call Rock, he said he didn’t have a problem with shutting down churches because he likes to err on the side of caution. Rock is in his 70s, has gone into sepsis twice in the last 18 months, and suffers from diabetes. He can live with the shutdown, he said, because it is temporary and we have alternatives to gathering in church buildings.

The favored alternative was to utilize social technology for online worship. My place of work held prayer meetings over Zoom and those inspired us. Yet even as technology served as a stopgap, many of us lamented its limitations. 

The subtle cues of body language easily got lost in digital gatherings. Emoticons were no substitute for the squeeze of a hand or a pat on the shoulder. Voices conveyed less meaning filtered through electronics. When my church held call-in prayer meetings, for example, I often could not tell who was speaking. Electronic gurgles detracted from—and even drowned—comments. And candor was fettered: Who wanted to create a permanent cyberspace record of a confession or a sensitive prayer request? 

Online worship didn’t work for everyone either. Rock, who is technologically challenged, could not connect on Zoom. A friend whom I’ll call Pam could not afford internet. Before the virus, she accessed the web at libraries. Now that libraries were closed, her church’s internet worship might as well have been held on Mars for all the good it did her. No one ever accommodated her—her church had few resources and some older members admitted they, too, were baffled by the tech and also were missing the broadcasts. 

My concern with online worship went beyond that. Cameras created a perception that the service was a show: a performance by a few. Is a nonparticipatory church really a church?

Sitting on my lawn (a violation of our governor’s orders), my friend Mika (not her real name) stressed the void that comes with electronic “participation.” She missed community, “You know, like the song says, ‘I’m so glad I’m a part of the family of God.’” 

Fifty years old, with dangerously high thyroid levels and severe diabetes, Mika remains a prime candidate for viral complications. Yet she would risk the danger for the sake of joining with others. “I’m sure we could wear masks, distance ourselves, clean the pews. That’s something I’d volunteer for.” 

She reminded me that the Bible commands us not to forsake assembling together. 

The Kentucky pastor also missed community. “We feel acutely the loss … of being able to share the Eucharist together,” she said. However, she noted a positive development: Her church’s virtual services attracted people who had not been attending in the flesh. 

Although Rock was OK with the closures, he still had concerns. By our absence from church, we could not as easily use our spiritual gifts for person-to-person edification he noted. He also wondered aloud if closing churches did not indicate a failure to trust God.

“I need my church family,” Pam said plaintively. “If I had a choice, I would go and I would not wear gloves and mask.” 

And so I found my question answered: By declaring church gatherings nonessential, we demonstrated the opposite. They are essential, at least for some Christians—not so much for the sermons and the music as for the community, personal vibes, and shared rites. However, my foreboding that churches, by accepting the definition “nonessential,” were making themselves so, has also been bourne out by events. Now that churches are reopened, many former attendees simply are not coming back—in some cases because of persistent fear of the virus, but in others because they tell me they have lost interest or simply gotten out of the habit. At bottom I believe they have lost respect for an organization that claims to speak for God but at the moment of crisis showed it feared government more than God. Although I’ve returned to church, I find myself unable to shake the latter thought.

Clearly, we needed to reopen. That does not mean we should become as reckless as Pam would be. Family Research Council put out sensible “Guidelines for Reopening Your Church.”[3] Based on CDC advisories, this guide recommends mitigation behaviors such as staying home if we feel sick, social distancing in seats, taking temperatures at the door, and cleaning surfaces after human contact. One of its less obvious suggestions is to avoid passing an offering plate; another is to stop distributing bulletins. 

My own suggestion was that we separate the leaders on stage from the congregation with transparent plastic hangings to prevent projection of disease-bearing particles in either direction. If a church has a sound system, let it carry the platform voices. 

With Wuhan virus likely to return in the fall and other pandemics inevitable, we need to determine nowhow to face them. Personal choice must be paramount. Let fearful Christians quarantine themselves just as fearful soldiers were allowed to withdraw before battle in Old Testament law (Deuteronomy 20:8). But don’t restrict all churchgoers because a few are vulnerable or timid. Although critics will argue that no one has a right to increase risk to others by choosing liberty, no one can yet put an accurate number on any specific individual’s risk. Scientific models predicting this pandemic’s spread were dismally wrong.[4] What emerged as the weeks passed was that, with less than 0.3% of confirmed cases dying (not the 3%–6% originally projected), risk of death was low for all but the elderly and a few groups with pre-existing medical conditions.[5]

At any rate, lockdowns did little to prevent spread of the disease. Governor Cuomo expressed shock over a development unforeseen to him: More than 60% of New Yorkers contracted their cases at home.[6]

Opponents of loosened restrictions claimed that this virus could be transmitted by asymptomatic individuals (a claim recently denied by the World Health Organization (WHO) which backpedaled the next day because of the outcry—although contact tracing from a dozen countries showed asymptomatic spread was negligible. Apparently for WHO, science changes according to political calculus). Diseases are difficult to compare because no two are identical. However, other dangerous viruses such as measles and the flu spread through asymptomatic individuals and we’ve never before locked down the healthy because of those diseases. Hundreds of thousands of people contract leprosy each year and to this day we are unsure how it is transmitted, but its apparently lengthy contagion period calls only for the quarantine of the affected individuals, not of the general population.

I believe the best approach is to let those who want to self-isolate do so but respect the rights of those who choose to gather. Traditionally, only sick people faced mandatory quarantine, although healthy individuals could voluntarily sequester themselves (Boccaccio’s fourteenth-century Decameron has as its structure 10 people telling tales while sheltering from the Black Plague) or move to safer areas, as Wittenberg University did in the 1552 plague.

Meanwhile what? While I believe the denial of religious assembly is both unnecessary[7] and unconstitutional,[8] the situation on the ground when I wrote this was that churches in many places still were not gathering because of arbitrary and unscientific[9] governmental decrees. Even Rock expressed concern about the unconstitutional precedent. “If this was persecution,” he said, “I’d defy the authorities and go to church.”

I’m not sure there wasn’t an element of persecution. At the least, I saw a double standard. It would be no harder to distance people safely in churches than in the waiting rooms of abortion clinics (which remained open in my state, even while urgent surgeries such as post-mastectomy breast reconstruction were forbidden). Press conferences, which governors routinely held, had setups similar to churches, with speakers at podiums addressing seated audiences for lengthy times.

Customers thronged the big chain stores in my city from the start of the pandemic; weeks later no spike in cases suggested they had become contamination hotspots.[10] If stores could operate safely, churches could find ways too.[11]

Could we be the body of Christ under pandemic strictures?

Of course we could, even if it meant lurching as if crippled. The church is the body of Christ and can be found wherever a single individual obeys God rather than man. The church is active when a Christian with a small surplus writes a check to help feed impoverished brethren. It is active when Christians open their homes to lonely fellow believers. It is active when, for Christ’s sake, someone offers an odd job to a neighbor who is desperate for a few dollars to make ends meet. 

I’m not naturally bold. I don’t want to contract Wuhan virus. I fear the government’s power to fine and to imprison. Yet faced with the virus and dubious edicts that deny peaceable assembly[12] and worship, I accepted the risk of infection and chose civil disobedience after careful consideration of the proper application of Romans 13:1, which commands us to obey authorities.

Despite stay-at-home orders, I met as safely as I knew how with others, including in a house church. Rock and I met for prayer each week. My wife and I have a friend whose only child has rejected her. When her church closed, she had no one to turn to. That is why, although police sat in their cars observing our street several times a week, we had her spend a few nights with us around Mother’s Day. 

The church requires a corporate dimension to meet its essential functions: to celebrate the Lord’s Supper, to baptize, to share worship, and to fulfill its role in edification. I’m glad that is back. And now that we have it, I hope we have the grit never to relinquish it again.

[1]I choose to call the disease the “Wuhan virus” because the world’s largest dictatorship insists it be called something else. This pandemic originated in China, which aggravated its spread by reporting falsely that it could not spread human to human, and by restricting travel from the hotspot within its own borders while allowing hundreds of thousands of Chinese to travel abroad from the danger zone. In honor of the brave doctors of Wuhan who attempted to warn the world and were crushed by the Communist party for doing so, I believe we do well to stick with the truth. The media had no problem calling this virus by names such as the Chinese virus or Wuhan flu until China threw a fit.

[2]“The Coronavirus and the Constitution.”


[4]Article after article in the last three months has remarked on the wide range of predictions the models make and noted that their projections routinely fail. Those who defend the models admit this but say models are not meant to actually produce accurate results or cannot do so because of inadequate data. Either way, projections of individual danger offer such a spread as to be useless. Here are some of the many articles that have come to my notice.
“The Failure of Expert Predictions and Models”

[5]Several news stories and articles place the death rate around 0.2%. The CDC now puts it at 0.26% according to the justthenews story linked below. I could not confirm the information in the less-than-intuitive CDC site, but a BBC page also presents a similar estimate.

[6]Although the news article linked in this note says “a majority,” I watched the governor’s news conference in which he gave a figure in the 60% range.

[7]From the start I doubted lockdown was needed, which led me to issue a few protest emails and brought me into a serious disagreement with my wife about whether or not to travel to a conference in Colorado (it was canceled).

[8]A recent narrow ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States has sided with lockdown of churches. However, it does not specifically address constitutional usurpations.

[9]The science shows that 42% of deaths have been in the 1.6% of the population that resides in nursing homes. Placing infected cases in those homes contributed to thousands of deaths in Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, and New Jersey. Sunshine, fresh air, and exercise make good preventatives, but stay-at-home measures ignored this wisdom. Taiwan did not shut down, opting for sensible restrictions, and was almost virus free. Sweden, whose population, city sizes, and technological sophistication closely match Michigan’s, had 418 deaths per million without stringent governmental controls while Michigan had 523 per million with onerous lockdown rules as of the writing of this article in May 2020.

[10]Colorado, however, traced a number of cases to stores.

[11]The Kentucky pastor wrote me again, “The church where [my husband] plays the organ resumed meeting on Sunday; they had every other pew roped off, masks for all (except for the moment of receiving Eucharist), abundant use of hand sanitizer, and no communal singing, only his instrumental prelude and postlude.”

[12]Michigan’s governor showed that her edicts were arbitrary and not genuinely believed when she violated her own orders to march with Black Lives Matter, while decrying as dangerous peaceable assemblies that pleaded with her to reopen the economy.